Saturday, November 29, 2008
Even if you discount half of the abundance of online comments at wacotrib.com regarding mounting controversy at the McLennan County Sheriff’s Office, enough of those posting make one thing abundantly clear: Someone in county government had better show some leadership and transparency before things get uglier.
An attorney for a long-influential statewide police union has sent a cease-and-desist letter to McLennan County Sheriff Larry Lynch, seeking to end what the union calls the sheriff’s “illegal union-busting attempts” to quash a sheriff’s employees group.
The letter alleges uniformed deputies are being used to intimidate 60 or so members of the McLennan County Sheriff’s Office Association — primarily jailers — and undermine their efforts to ensure job and benefits protection as top county officials wrestle with jail expansion and the prickly idea of privatization.
Tom Stribling, staff attorney for the Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas, goes on to say the alleged tactics may violate state law and his clients’ First Amendment rights.
Underlying all this: The strong suspicion by some that county leaders, despite earlier decisions to the contrary, may be poised to privatize all jail facilities, not just some of them.
The newly re-elected sheriff has come in for the worst in all this, partially because of his absence during last summer’s heated debate over jail options. Some critics characterize him as the stereotypical sheriff of old-time westerns who puts up a “Gone fishing” sign on the door and departs when trouble rides into town.
We don’t yet believe that of our sheriff. Supporters we spoke with on Election Day talked readily of his integrity and courage. Fair enough. Then it’s high time for the sheriff to help bring unity to his department, healing the rift widening between jailers and others in his charge.
To fail is to make mockery of the very words Sheriff Lynch’s supporters used to champion him in a contested election. And, yes, that also means his speaking honestly and forcefully with constituents — the public that showed such faith in him just 25 days ago — regardless of whether it pleases or disappoints jailers in the end.
We all need to know where our sheriff stands.







Comments
By Brake
Dec 2, 2008 1:56 PM | Link to this
Most regular folks know that when a union is formed just to support the boss then that union aint worth joining. Any time the working guy forms a union so he will have someone trying to look out for him the next thing you know here comes the brown nosers. Brown nosers always come out swinging, supporting the sheriff because they think that he will do something nice for them and let them keep working. Its a sad day when the working people are afraid to stand up for themselves against an oppressive employer who intends to take away their jobs.
By ras
Nov 30, 2008 11:46 PM | Link to this
Larry Lynch is paid $1,000 a month by CEC. Lynch assigns county prisoners to be housed, at tax payer expense, at the downtown jail. CEC takes care of Lynch and Lynch makes sure CEC has enough prisoners to remain profitable. Maintain their margin so to speak. Lynch does it with taxpayer money and knows that a person would have to monitor daily head counts for both facilities to prove it. The problem being, CEC is a private company and not subject to Texas Open Records Act. If you are waiting to see leadership in County government, I hope you are not holding your breath. A real sheriff would manage the facilities and lease the extra space to offset the expense of housing prisoners. If Lynch fires CEC he would lose his sweet deal.
By Outsider
Nov 30, 2008 12:02 PM | Link to this
Fred reminds me of one of those guys I used to hear talking about how great the union was out at General Tire and when they were on strike it seemed almost yearly. Where are those guys now? (Hint: Not at General Tire) The main cause current automotive crisis can be summed up in three letters UAW. But union pro or con is not the point.
If you have an illness, you treat it. If you have cancer, you cut it out. From what I have heard from my friends in the SO this association was set up and run by a few unpopular characters within the jail as a way to give them some credibility, and most deputies and jailers never even knew of it's existance. When privatization came to the forefront, it wasn't the association who organized those who showed up at Commissioners court every tuesday but the real leadership in the jail who initially spoke to the media.
Then suddenly the association president with his CLEAT Rep. in tow gets on t.v. running down the sheriff, and the media makes it sound like he speaks for all employees when in reality he spoke only for himself and a few friends at that point. Rather than form a second association other deputies and jailers interested are urged to join the current one with promises of new bylaws and equal representation. Then suddenly we have allegations of "Union Busting" on the part of the sheriff to stop any changes in the association's bylaw revisions.
Bottom line is if there was some secret plot to privatize the jail,why would the sheriff have moved so quickly to promote someone to fill the captain vacancy over there. The sheriff now has four years till he has to face the voters again, and the "MCSOA" has no seat at the table in the decision processes if they continue to work against him, and trash him publicly. The decision is his and the Commissioner's, do we have an illness that can be treated, or is it cancer and cut it out. Many people's career hang in the balance, and rely on cooler heads prevailing. That's why there is so much controversy.
By Hewitt Citizen
Nov 30, 2008 3:14 AM | Link to this
So far a privitization goes and overcrowding at the jail, there are 200 beds at the currently private downtown jail that are being used by CEC to house out of county inmates and federal inmates. When you consider the total jail population at the moment is anywhere from 850 to 1000 inmates, 200 additional beds would go a long way.
The downtown jail can be taken back from CEC by the county according to the contract (at least that's what the Commissioners were talking about as an option.) So why not do so?
Maybe that's some of the leadership that we're about to see.
By Fred
Nov 29, 2008 5:30 AM | Link to this
Waco and McLennan County have been anti-Union for decades. This is one of the reasons that Waco has not grown in over one hundred years (like Dallas, Austin and San Antonio). No Organized Labor is one of the reasons that Poverty pervades Waco (fifth highest in the State) with the wages being dirt-low. And now the Waco Tribune (the Rag of Slaughterhouse Waco) is doing it's part in the Union-Busting effort in full support of Sheriff Lynch and the anti-labor effort. Workers in Waco are going to get "beat down" at the mere mention of the word.....Union. And Waco has the rampant poverty and dirt-low wages to prove it.
Commenting is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F, except on Tuesday when it's open until 9 p.m.
Post a comment
*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.