Subscribe to Waco Trib XML RSS Feed E-Newsletter WacoTrib on your PDA
Register Now.  It's Free!  |  Log In
Classifieds
Wacotrib Cars
Real Estate
Employment
Merchandise
NATION
Waco crime | Photo / video | Neighbor | State | Nation | World | Weather | Archives
Bookmark and Share E-mail this page Print this page Most E-mailed/Most printed small medium large Type size

National Park Service wants historic cemetery designation and other changes around Waco's Texas Ranger Museum



Tuesday, May 12, 2009

The National Park Service is asking the city of Waco to rededicate land around the Texas Ranger Museum as a historic cemetery, remove some roads in the area and have it dedicated as a State Archaeological Landmark.

Those are some of the steps proposed in a draft memorandum of understanding, recently made public, that would release 17 acres of Fort Fisher Park from restrictions imposed by a federal park grant in the late 1960s.

Archaeologists have been excavating remains around the Texas Ranger Museum annex. The discovery of some 200 bodies delayed the opening of the Texas Ranger Company F headquarters. (Duane A. Laverty photo)

Past coverage

The site is to be “converted” to nonpark use and replaced with other parkland upstream at the Waco Mammoth Site.

The National Park Service also recently declared the 157-year-old cemetery site eligible for a listing in the National Register of Historic Places.

The draft memorandum of understanding on the conversion is available for public inspection and comment at www.waco-texas.com.

Assistant City Attorney Annette Jones said the city basically is in agreement with the memorandum but will seek some “minor tweaking” of the language.

T. Bradford Willis, a dentist and amateur historian who has criticized the city’s handling of the graves, said the memorandum would help ensure respect for the dead.

“I would hope the city would want to honor the pioneers of Waco, black, white, Asian and Hispanic, that are buried in the cemetery,” he said. “This is a wonderful starting point, though it needs input from consulting parties to make it better.”

The park service conversion process complicates an archaeological headache already under way at Fort Fisher Park.

The museum and Fort Fisher Park were built on the eastern side of the old First Street Cemetery in 1968, after it was cleared of gravestones and some human remains. The federal Land and Water Conservation Fund helped develop the park as a recreation and camping spot, obligating the city to preserve it for recreational use permanently.

Some 200 human remains have been discovered and excavated in the last two years as the city has attempted to add a Texas Ranger regional headquarters behind the museum. The discoveries have delayed the project and added some $1.9 million to its cost.

Late last year, the city discovered it also would have to officially convert the area to nonpark use because of the construction. That process includes what is known as a Section 106 review under the National Historic Preservation Act to ensure that historic resources are protected.

The review concluded that the area in question included part of the historic First Street Cemetery and that the conversion would cause “adverse impacts” to the cemetery. City officials had argued that the developed eastern side of Fort Fisher could no longer be considered a cemetery because it had been “cleared” under the old court order. The memorandum of understanding makes no distinction between the east side and the west side, which is currently marked as First Street Cemetery.

The National Park Service’s stipulations are meant to mitigate the adverse impacts. In addition to road removal, rededication and commemorative plaques, the stipulations include gathering information on the cemetery and storing it at a local library.

The draft agreement also directs the city to make “a decision regarding the disposition of remains under the new education building,” referring to part of the nearly completed Texas Ranger annex.

Jones, the assistant city attorney, declined to comment on the possibility that there are human remains under the annex. She said that question is part of ongoing litigation between the city and its former archaeologist, American Archaeology, which was paid to study the site before construction began.

John Griggs, an archaeologist who worked under contract for that firm, said he believes there are remains there. He produced a copy of a May 22, 2008, e-mail that an official with the city’s new archaeology contractor, PBS&J of Austin, sent to an official with the Texas Historical Commission.

According to the e-mail, workers came across a burial that “extends underneath the building or right up to the foundation, at least.”

Griggs has battled the city on its handling of the graves since American Archaeology was fired in early 2008. He said he pushed for the National Register listing as a way to protect the remaining graves at the site.

jbsmith@wacotrib.com

757-5752

Comments

By caddolake

Jun 6, 2009 7:31 AM | Link to this

The government officials don't let telling you but the National Historic Preservation Act encourages citizens to participate in the decisions being made on all this, including the agreement memorandum. The people of Waco are not limited to just watching this happen. Take a look at the book "Saving Places That Matter" by Thomas King (it is a paperback not hard to get a copy).

By J.P.

May 12, 2009 2:06 PM | Link to this

Some things I guess will never change. 40 yrs. ago they built the campground on the mainly black area & now they are putting office bldgs. in the same place.
Why haven't the city council members/"leaders" said something about this sorry situation?

By Dollar Bill

May 12, 2009 1:14 PM | Link to this

J.P.--I hope you're kidding. WISD was still segregated in the 1960s. No black person in his right mind would have spoken out in the 1960's about the black section of the cemetery being used as a campground. The sad, thing, however, is that other than school integration, probably not that much has changed.

By J. P.

May 12, 2009 12:41 PM | Link to this

Why was Ft. Fisher camping area built on top of the mainly black part of the cemetery and not on top of the mainly white part?
I wonder if this was just accidental. Why haven't those city officials who are still around told us about what happened in the '60s?

By Dollar Bill

May 12, 2009 12:09 PM | Link to this

Why won't Jones give an honest answer to a straightforward question? She is an attorney for the City of Waco so isn't she supposed to serve the taxpayers, and if so, don't they deserve an answer? How would her answer affect the litigation if she is going to answer fully and truthfully? Or is it that she is going to shape her answer to fit whatever evidence might be held by the opposing side about what and when she and the City knew about the new structures being built on top of bodies?

By null

May 12, 2009 11:26 AM | Link to this

More of us finding out what they want you to know and not the facts or truth neccesarily involved in the matter...that is why the Good citizens of Waco always find out last.....

By Sam

May 12, 2009 11:15 AM | Link to this

This is very interesting. I seem to remember that the City of Waco was telling us last year that this land was just an informal burial ground for paupers, and now the NPS says it is eligible for the National Register? What's going on here?

Commenting is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F, except on Tuesday when it's open until 9 p.m.

Post a comment



Remember me?

You may use the following formatting:
Bold: **this text will be bolded** = this text will be bolded
Italic: *this text will be italic* = this text will be italic
Link: [text to be linked](http://www.wacotrib.com) = text to be linked



There will be a delay of up to 5 minutes before your comment appears.


*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.

 
Waco Tribune-Herald Top Cars
Ford Focus 2007. 2.0L, 4 CYL., Automatic, FI, Gray. $8775 Call (254)826-367......(more)
Honda Element, 2003, 2.4L I4 16V MPFI DOHC, Special Purpose Vehicle...(more)
Pontiac Aztek, 2005, 3.4L V6 12V MPFI OHV, Special Purpose Vehicle...(more)
Ford F-250, 2008, 6.4L V8 32V DDI OHV Twin Turbo Diesel, Vehicles Over 8,500 lbs...(more)
Chevrolet TrailBlazer, 2006, 4.2L I6 24V MPFI DOHC, Special Purpose Vehicle...(more)
Ford Focus 2006. 2.0L, 4 CYL., Automatic, FI, Silver. $9450 Call (254)826-3......(more)
Rear Wheel Drive|Traction Control|Electronic Stability Control|Tires - Fron......(more)
Power Passenger Mirror|Tires - Front On/Off Road|Intermittent Wipers|Power ......(more)
Chevrolet Impala, 2005, 3.4L V6 12V MPFI OHV, Large Car...(more)
Traction Control|Front Wheel Drive|Tires - Front Performance|Tires - Rear P......(more)
-View All Top Cars-
-Place an Ad-
 

Wacotrib News | Wacotrib Weather | Sports | Living | Business News | Wacotrib Schools | Opinions | Baylor Football
Wacotrib Cars | Wacotrib Real Estate | Wacotrib Jobs | Classifieds | Sitemap

Copyright 2009 Waco Tribune-Herald. All rights reserved. - The Waco Tribune-Herald

By using this service, you accept the terms of our visitor agreement.  About our ads 
Registered site users, you may edit your profile.
Having trouble? Visit our help & FAQ.