Tuesday, October 07, 2008
By Tim Woods
Tribune-Herald staff writer
McLennan Community College trustees took the final step in putting to rest a settlement on a failed eminent domain claim Monday night.
In all, the fruitless effort to purchase a neighboring property ended up costing the school nearly half a million dollars.
At the specially called meeting, trustees approved a payment of $429,360.07 to attorneys from Barron and Adler, an Austin firm specializing in eminent domain claims. That included $4,360.07 in court costs.
Barron and Adler represented Affordable Housing Partnerships, a Houston-based nonprofit group that owns the 23-acre property on College Drive, immediately adjacent to the MCC campus. The site used to be the Northwood Apartments, which were razed in 2003.
MCC paid Affordable Housing a $65,000 settlement last week to cover costs from the college’s attempt to buy the property through an eminent domain claim.
MCC President Dennis Michaelis said the school had wanted to buy the property since 1988 as part of its master plan for future expansion. MCC filed the claim last fall.
The school had the property appraised at $1 million, but Affordable Housing had the property appraised at $7.7 million.
At a November hearing, three court commissioners from a county administrative court determined that MCC would have to pay $4.86 million to buy the property. Michaelis said last week the figure the court presented was too high, and MCC withdrew its claim.
“We’re not going to pay an absurd price for (the land),” Michaelis said.
Because MCC filed and withdrew the claim, the college was liable for costs incurred by Affordable Housing throughout the process and settled with Affordable Housing for $65,000, a figure approved Sept. 30 by trustees.
However, the suit to recover attorneys’ fees for work done by Barron and Adler on Affordable Housing’s behalf remained.
MCC claimed in a court filing that no money was owed to the attorneys because they were working on contingency and no recovery was made by Affordable Housing, other than the reimbursement for costs incurred.
Barron and Adler, though, said they should be paid $1,284,666.67 as “reasonable and necessary attorneys fees,” according to court documents. In their filing, Barron and Adler said in other cases involving the same section of the state property code, courts ruled if the group that tried to condemn a piece of property, then cancels the condemnation, that group is to pay the landowner “reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees.” In this case, MCC was the condemner.
The two sides, with a mediator, settled on the $429,360.07 figure Friday, Michaelis said.
A manager for Affordable Housing was unavailable for comment Monday afternoon.
Both settlements will be paid out of a $533,369 surplus from the 2007-2008 budget, Michaelis said at Monday’s meeting. Therefore, tax rates will not be affected.
Trustee chairman Randy Cox said paying the settlement for attorneys’ fees was “a really tough pill to swallow,” although he said he understood why the school had to pay the $65,000 to Affordable Housing.
Cox said the school wasn’t willing to roll the dice on a jury trial for the nearly $1.3 million Barron and Adler were asking for.
“We weren’t confident that we would get a reasonable decision from a jury trial, so it came down to, ‘How big of a chance are we willing to take, faced with a $1.3 million possible outcome?’ ” Cox said. “We just felt like it was in the best interest of the college and the taxpayers, rather than to (possibly) incur more legal fees.”
twoods@wacotrib.com
757-5721







Comments
By By Angered Taxpayer
Oct 9, 2008 4:17 PM | Link to this
Dennis Michaelis should be fired for the misuse of funds and the burden he has put or will put on all taxpayer's! $533,369.00 of MCC's funds for nothing, a settlement only because of his arrogance and greed, seems to me he should attend classes in Economics 101.
By Joe Taxpayer
Oct 8, 2008 10:29 AM | Link to this
Must correct myself. I see now where the comments are coming from. I was unaware of the bond issue - which, in effect, had ALREADY raised taxes before this property purchase failed.
By Joe Taxpayer
Oct 8, 2008 10:24 AM | Link to this
Why are folks complaining about the burden on taxpayers? The article says "Both settlements will be paid out of a $533,369 surplus from the 2007-2008 budget... Therefore, tax rates will not be affected.
I would agree with the comment about "Economics 101", though. The appraisal was substandard to begin with. They should have done more homework before filing the claim. Then when they withdrew the claim, the costs more than they expected.
Bad business deal, sure. Reduced profits for the school, sure. Higher taxes? No.
By mike
Oct 8, 2008 8:25 AM | Link to this
I am uncertain what long range plans MCC has in mind that would give need to acquiring a 20+ acre tract of land. Just because an available property adjoins you is not a mandate you have to own same. Having said that one can conclude there was a poor job of defending the appraised value and/or the condemnation examiners had absolutely no concept or understanding of property value trends in the neighborhood as the MCC offer appears more than fair. However, as usual the taxpayer bears the burden.
By null
Oct 7, 2008 11:25 PM | Link to this
disgusting
By Rosa
Oct 7, 2008 7:18 PM | Link to this
After reading this article, if the bond proposals pass, it will be like pouring LOT MORE $$ down the drain. When I vote, it will certainly be NO!
By taxpayer
Oct 7, 2008 5:30 PM | Link to this
Again, another entity that thinks they are entitled to do whatever they want to do! Great planning on your part MCC
trustees! I hope this isn't what you teach in Economics 101.
I guess now you'll need to raise more money! My vote will
be the same as last time! NO!!! Oh yeah, and thanks for the
higher taxes with - once again - nothing to show for it. I don't
know about the other McLennan Co. residents but I am sick and
tired of being asked to pay more and more for less and less!!
By Concerned Individual
Oct 7, 2008 4:11 PM | Link to this
The bond that passed to build MCC and that has cost the raising in taxes for McLennan residents; I know where that money has gone. Just my opinion but this is a grievous error in judgment and that amount of money that's being taken away from the students who pay to attend the college as well as McLennan residents who pay taxes and APPPROVED the bond should certainly demand accountability.
By Bob
Oct 7, 2008 3:18 PM | Link to this
Now, they'll be crying that MCC needs a financial bail out due to their trustees' stupidity like Wall Street and the Financial Markets.
The MCC Trustees are NOT to be trusted!
By null
Oct 7, 2008 2:54 PM | Link to this
...
[1 2] next
Commenting is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F, except on Tuesday when it's open until 9 p.m.
Post a comment
*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.