Thursday, February 19, 2009
Two stories from the This Changes Everything Department:
* Blackwater Security Worldwide Inc., which has run up a portfolio of atrocities under contract in Iraq, has changed its name to Xe. (Pronounced “Z.”)
* Meanwhile the Republican Party, having unashamedly run up debt for eight years, has renamed itself the Prudence Party.
Members of the PP, Prudes for short, can say they opposed deficit spending from the start, since the party’s new brand wasn’t around for the Reagan administration or either of the Bush administrations.
Hence, duly rebranded, the party can assail Barack Obama’s stimulus bill with near religiosity. For debt runs against the very core of the party’s newly minted principles.
When the then Republican Party was running up debt, putting two wars off-budget, awarding “cost-plus” contracts to the likes of Halliburton and Blackwater (Xe), we weren’t supposed to worry our handsome little heads over the matter.
Recent reports about corruption in Iraq reconstruction (a term now certifiably oxymoronic) should make every American shudder. It ranges from shrink-wrapped bricks of $100 bills that spread with the desert winds to bid-rigging and bribes that may have enriched U.S. military honchos, according to The New York Times.
Reports the Times, the $125 billion spent “to improve services and convince Iraqis of American good will, largely managed to do neither.” Oh, well. It’s only money.
So, now we have a major spending bill directed at — of all things — tending to matters on these shores. And we have the born-again Prudence Party in full flower.
No one can look at the stimulus measure and not worry about the size and added debt incurred. We can all debate whether some of the measures are true stimulus components or simply things an activist White House wants addressed.
One thing about this package, though: It’s all there for you to examine, along with built-in apparatuses to monitor how the money is spent.
Will it stimulate? Of course, it will. The combination of tax cuts and spending will get things moving.
Will we recoup the cost? Probably not. At some point when the economy is righted we need to dispense with the notion that we can have this government (including a military that spans the globe) without paying what it costs. Yes, raise taxes. Yes, on all of us.
Back when Bill Clinton signed a bill raising taxes on upper incomes, the opposition predicted economic catastrophe. Some catastrophe. Before the end of his administration, for the first time in a generation, our government actually was buying back its bonds, paying down debt.
If you are really serious about debt, you see, you acknowledge that we’ve bought more government than we are willing to pay for. You say it’s time to pay for it.
Who was going to pay for our armed venture in Iraq? No one prosecuting the notion gave it a thought.
Yes, Prudence, it’s time to give thought to the debts we are accumulating.
Rest assured, however, were the Republicans still the party in power, the current economic crisis would have caused them to raise the national debt further as they leaned on the one-trick pony of tax cuts.
Voters chose another pony.
John Young’s column appears Thursday and Sunday. E-mail: jyoung@wacotrib.com.







Comments
By Sammy
Feb 19, 2009 3:53 PM | Link to this
And to think I actually fantasized that the Trib editors would soon run out of material once the Republicans were out of power and the Democrats were back in. Silly me!
By Monkey See Monkey Do
Feb 19, 2009 10:01 AM | Link to this
You're critical of deficits run up by Republicans, yet hail deficits run up by Democrats and the Waco City Council.
You are a wise man indeed, Grasshopper.
By Robbie
Feb 19, 2009 8:37 AM | Link to this
Not sure what this has to do with Blackwater, unless we're trying to throw out all the liberal talking points in a single sentence to start this thing off...
I find it ironic that liberals, in one sentence, condemn the Republican's spending while praising and lifting up the spending of the Democrats in the next. For example, from your pen... "Meanwhile the Republican Party, having unashamedly run up debt for eight years..." vs. "Will it stimulate? Of course, it will. The combination of tax cuts and spending will get things moving."
Isn't spending what the Republicans did? Doesn't this latest bill tack on to that? What was stimulating about the Republican's spending that makes you think that the Democrats' spending can stimulate better?
It's utterly absurd, and you come off as more of a whining badger than an informed journalist. There's absolutely no consistency to this. It reads more like a string of profanities after having your foot run over than a collected opinion regarding the latest spending package.
Furthermore, the information you based this opinion on, in many regards, is false. You mention that "Before the end of [Clinton's] administration, for the first time in a generation, our government actually was buying back its bonds, paying down debt." Does this include the recession we were in at near end of his term in 2000-2001?
You want a true stimulus package? Then you stimulate my wallet so I, an American worker, can spend more on things that I want and save more for future needs. You open up the channels for business owners to invest more, earn more off their investments, and grow their businesses so they can hire more career-minded people. I am not aware of a single nation or individual that spent its way out of debt.
Commenting is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F, except on Tuesday when it's open until 9 p.m.
Post a comment
*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.