Subscribe to Waco Trib XML RSS Feed E-Newsletter WacoTrib on your PDA
Register Now.  It's Free!  |  Log In
Classifieds
Wacotrib Cars
Real Estate
Employment
Merchandise

Home > The Listening Post > Archives > 2008 > February > 29 > Entry

Barack Obama speaks to Trib on veterans issues

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama held a town hall meeting in Houston with U.S. Rep. Chet Edwards, D-Waco to discuss veterans issues.

After the meeting, I spoke with Obama in a phone interview about how he would address issues facing veterans health care and benefits. Edwards, chairman of the U.S. House appropriations subcommittee over VA spending, has endorsed Obama.

Below is the full transcript from the conversation:

Tribune-Herald:

What was the message you wanted to get across in your town hall meeting in Houston today?

Barack Obama:

The fact that we have a sacred trust with our veterans. When we decide to send them overseas to fight our battles for us, we’ve got to make sure we are fighting for them and the benefits they have earned when they come home. We have not been doing that over the last several years. We continue to see chronic delays in dissaiblity payments. We continue to see our VA facilities not provide the kind of care that so many of veterans need. We are not doing the screening for post-traumatic stress disorder and mental health services that required. Here in Texas you have veterans in South Texas who are having to drive hours to get to nearest VA hospital. We’ve got a lot of middle income veterans who have been denied access to VA services altogether. And this administration has not provided the resources and the attention that is needed to upgrade the system and that is something that is going to be a top priority of mine when I am president of the United States.

Tribune-Herald:

How has the United States done in providing for the soldiers returning from Iraq and Afghanistan?

Barack Obama:

We know we have not seen the kinds of screenings for post traumatic stress disorder that is one of the signature injuries of this war. The same is true for traumatic brain injury. I have been pushing on both those fronts, making sure that not only the screening is done but also that the mental health services are then provided.

We are seeing a growth in homeless veterans because we have not done that kind of adequate screening. Another major concern is how we are treating our National Guard men and women and reservists, who are being used essentially like active duty soldiers, but are getting the same benefits and the same care when they come home. I think that is something we are going to have to change.

Finally in respect to faciliteis like Walter Reed (Army Medical Center) or (William Beaumont Army Medical Center) here in Texas, what we are seeing is that those facilities don’t have all the upgrades they need despite the scandal at Walter Reed.

We just found out that President Bush has left out $400 million in appropriations for upgrading these facilities that are going to be coming through in a supplemental (bill) that were not included in the original budget. And that I think is typical for an administration that has low-balled the needs for the majority of our returning service men and women and that is something I intend to change when I am president of the United States.

Tribune-Herald:

You have said that as president that you would see to it that Congress passes on-time budgets for the VA. But even last year when Democrats were in control of Congress the VA budget was delayed for three months because of political squabbling. How will you do it any differently?

Barack Obama:

Typically the squabbling results from this administration not providing enough funding and having battles with a Democratic Congress or at least Democratic Senate and House members like Chet Edwards, who want to make sure that funding is in place.

Chet Edwards:

One thing on the timing specifically. One of the challenges was that the administration was threatening to veto the largest increase in VA health care and benefits funding in the history of the Veterans Administration. That delayed the process.

In addition, when Democratic Congress took over in 2007, the previous Congress had not even passed a VA budget, so we started out with a frozen budget for veterans hospitals during a time of war. So we had to catch up from the previous Congress and then fight the White House.

Let me just say why I am so enthusiastically supporting Sen. Obama. After years and years of presidential budgets that have woefully underfunded veterans and benefits, our veterans deserve a change in Washington. And I want a president who is going to propose budgets that truly honor the sacrifice of America’s heroes.

I have seen these inadequate budgets coming out of Democratic and Republican administrations. In all due respect, and I have respect for former president Clinton and Mrs. Clinton, but during the eight years of the Clinton White House, the VA budget was only increased by 38.3 percent. That wasn’t even close to keeping up with health care inflation and the increasing number of veterans needing that care.

In this administration we have seen inadquate VA budgets. In fact, the present budget from president Bush would cut current services for veterans by $20 billion over the next five years. That is just not right. I am convinced that Sen. Obama is going to be a champion for veterans and military families as president just as he has been a champion as a senator and as a member of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee.

Tribune-Herald:

What are your thoughts on mandatory funding for the VA, a proposal that many veterans groups have advocated for instead of the discretionary funding process that is used now?

Barack Obama:

I think it is important for us to make sure we have on-time and adequate budgets and whatever is needed to put that in place I want to consider. As president I am going to be reviewing the possibilities of creating a mandatory budget versus the current appropriations process. But my priority is which ever way we do it, we’ve got to have on-time budgets and we have to have adequate budgets.

Tribune-Herald:

One of the complaints we hear most often about the VA is how long it takes for veterans to receive their benefits. We have a major benefits office in Waco, which last year got an influx of funding to hire more case workers. Besides more case workers what else can be done to improve the benefits delivery system?

Barack Obama:

Case workers are critical and we’ve got to make sure those caseworkers are in place and properly trained. One of the things that came up at the town hall meeting here in Houston was the fact that a lot of case workers are trained to think their job is to deny benefits. They end up being a lot like the claims officers at an insurance company, and that, in fact, is not the approrpriate approach. There shouldn’t be a bias against providing benefits, there should be an investigation as to what benefits are needed for these veterans. That would be one area that I would like to see improvements because often times I think that creates delays when their initial rejections are then overturned on appeal.

The second thing that we talked about during the town hall meeting is really doing a better job in making sure that every veteran’s military and service records are in electronic form and are digitally transmittable from the (Department of Defense) to the VA immediatley upon discharge.

I can’t tell you how many veterans I met who have stories about injuries they have received but they don’t know where their medical records are and it turns out they were in a warehouse somewhere and there was a fire in St. Louis and now they don’t know what to do and they get the run around.

It should not be the responsibility of an injured service man or woman to be thinking about their records. Their job should be to get well. They should be able to count on DOD to have those records in electronic form and easily transmittable to cut delays and that is going to be a top priority when I am president of the United States.

Chet Edwards:

What we need is a president who will bring the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the VA together and will say we are going to solve this problem. This problem has been kicked around for years now and I am convinced that as president Barack Obama is going to see that is done. There has been too much talk and too many promises for our veterans and our troops and our military families and he is going to be the president to see that we deliver on the promises that we have made to those who have served our country.

Tribune-Herald:

How would an Obama VA administration differ from a Hillary Clinton VA administration?

Barack Obama:

I don’t want to speak to Sen. Clinton’s plans. They are not ones that I am thoroughly familiar with. I can tell you how they are going to differ from George Bush’s VA and that is we are going to have every service man and woman having records kept that are accurate, that are provided in a timely way. We are going to reduce the backlogs of claims on disability payments. We are going to open up the VA to middle income veterans. We are going to make sure that facilities like Walter Reed are in tip-top shape and are providing the services that are needed. We are going to make sure that national guards men and women and our reservists are treated in a way that reflects the enormous responsibility that has been placed on their shoulders during this conflict.

We are going to make sure that we are upgrading the GI Bill so that when service men and women come home and they are pursuing an education that the benefits that they are provided actually will deliver on the college educations that they need to be successful, and we are going to make sure our budgets are on-time and adequate to accomplish these tasks.

I will be building on the work that I have done since I arrived in the United States Senate on the Veterans Affairs Committees, insisting that we have zero-tolerance for homeless veterans, insisting that we have got screening for post-traumatic stress disorder and insisting that our military family members get the support that they need.

That is something that came up in the town hall meeting that comes up again and again. The spouses and the children of these brave men and women are not getting the support that they need whether it is child care, adequate housing, school facilities that are appropriate. That is something that we’ve really got to work on and I intend to bring together military families from all across the country to meet with me and my secretary of the VA so that we are hearing from them directly because they are heroes just like those who are on the battlefield.

Permalink | Comments (10) |

Comments

Commenting is now closed for this entry.

By R.M

March 1, 2008 2:37 AM | Link to this

you are you want Obama he will SCREW US OVER he’s just in the race for the MONEY !!! (what a liar) www.obamatruth.org you sure you want this guy???

By Stephen Williams

March 1, 2008 8:01 AM | Link to this

First, I want to say I am not from Congressman Edwards district but have visited with him at the Waco VA facilities various ceremonies. I believe him to be sincere in all his efforts for veterans.

Yes, the current administration was going to veto the VA bill but, not because they didn’t want it. It was because it was loaded with “PORK” special interest earmarks from the democratic side of the house and senate.

Next, I would not trust Obama as far as I could throw him. This is a guy who has and still associates with individuals who have actually bombed this country. These are terrorists! Go and do your own research. Also, for someone who is running from president and can’t place their hand across their heart for the National Anthem nor wear an American Flag lapel pin is a disgrace. He gave some convoluted explanation like Clinton did for “the meaning of is”.

One can list all kinds of bills that Obama was involved in with his state and as a U.S. senator but look at how he actually voted “or didn’t vote”. What is the meaning of “present” for a vote. In my book, it means you don’t have the guts to vote up or down.

Bottom line, I couldn’t support Obama or Clinton. I think they both “personally” hate the military. What you see now is “vote getting”. What a shame.

Okay, my next statement will open up a can of worms. I would die for my country! Obama and Clinton would have to say, “it depends on the circumstances”. These are not “patriots”.

Well, here is my last comment, Obama, al queda is in IRAQ and your immediate pullout just leaves them there. It doesn’t matter how or when they got there. For you to dwell on that is “history”. You tell others to look forward when you yourself are looking back! The bottom line is we couldn’t trust you to do anything.

Stephen Williams Bastrop, Texas

By Chris

March 1, 2008 9:28 AM | Link to this

THINK AGAIN AMERICA! Adolf Hitler rose to power because of his orations and speeches. Jim Jones was a preacher whose followers drank poisoned kool-aid because of his

‘words’ Obama’s has ties to Louis Farrakhan and Obama’s church promotes black supremacy and anti-Semitism. You don’t get elected in Chicago playing nice. I need to elect

someone with a proven background! And who is giving him all his donations?

By LD

March 1, 2008 4:15 PM | Link to this

Chris - what a smear. You have as much class as school on Saturday: none. Making an ad hominem attack by associating with Hitler where there is no connection is baseless. Lincoln, Kennedy, Martin Luther King and Reagan all were known for their speeches so by your standard, they’re dictator material, too? Here’s a story that calls your kind of attack for what it is: http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/29/thelyingdespicable_campaign/

This is no different than John Hagee, the anti-Catholic ‘evangelist’ voicing support for McCain and also noted for disparaging remarks against Muslims and women. McCain first welcomed the endorsement but has now wisely backed off it. Obama never embraced Farrakhan’s endorsement from the beginning.

People like you Chris are why people are rallying to a guy like Obama. They’re tired of the dirty politics that have been played by Karl Rove and his disciples for the past umpteen years. Skulking around, making baseless claims and trying to smear people while at the same time avoiding the real issues America faces.

You’re about as fair and balanced as Rush Limbaugh.

Our current administration has done more to close government to the people and act more like a dictatorship than any administration in our history. Something illegal or violate the constitution? Well, heck, the president will just make it legal by executive order and get his folks off the hook. Incriminating evidence of wrongdoing by the VP? Ooops, we lost those emails. And how will they quiet someone critical of their tactics? Nothing less than outing the CIA agent wife of the critic. THAT is unAmerican and treasonous. So if you want to call someone Hitler-like, start looking at the “experience” you seem to treasure that rests in the current administration and its supporters and anointed successors.

By Stephen Williams, Bastrop

March 1, 2008 5:52 PM | Link to this

TO LD’s comments: Please don’t talk about Bushing having so many Executive Orders. Bill Clinton had more findings than Bush and they were much more controversial.

Obama does have associates of a bad nature. His minister for one. He wanted the lifetime achievement award for Farrakhan and Obama has NOT repudiated his minister for that. If you notice, he stills refers to the pig Farrakhan as “minister”.

Plame was not a “covert”. She outed herself overseas when dating her husband. She had to inform her runner and thus was brought home due to that. She wasn’t undercover for years following that.

You need to look up the definition of “treason”.

Let’s keep things to the facts and not the emotion.

Stephen

By LD

March 1, 2008 10:54 PM | Link to this

Definition 3 and check out the etymology. Originated from Middle English as word denoting “a handing over, betrayal”

Outed herself by dating someone? HA. You’re as delusional as the guy who thinks anyone who makes a good speech is Hitler.

It has been established that when Plame’s name was published by Robert Novak, she was employed as a classified operative. Just ask the chairman of the Congressional committee that investigated this matter: [http://oversight.house.gov/Documents/20070316104030-43341.pdf]

trea�son /ˈtrizən/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[tree-zuhn] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation �noun 1. the offense of acting to overthrow one’s government or to harm or kill its sovereign.
2. a violation of allegiance to one’s sovereign or to one’s state.
3. the betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery.

[Origin: 1175�1225; ME tre(i)so(u)n < AF; OF tra�son < L trāditiōn- (s. of trāditiō) a handing over, betrayal. See tradition]

By Stephen

March 2, 2008 5:28 PM | Link to this

Yes, by dating. Ms. Plame informed her future husband that she was in a covert position. That is outing oneself and a violation of CIA rules. She most likely then did the honorable spook thing and disclosed that and thus relieved herself of the shield.

I am certainly not delusional today, nor have I been since my service to our country in southeast asia.

By the way, I am not picking on you but just the facts. Please just settle down a bit.

By sylvia

March 2, 2008 11:39 PM | Link to this

This is an open letter to all the people who posted comments following the Trib. interview with Obama. 1.to RM. You sound like an idiot with nothing to say and too much time goofing off. 2. Steve Williams of Bastrop: Where did you do your research on Obama? What makes you say he is in contact with bin Laden? Info from what source? From the paper off the top of your head? And you seem to be giving him credit for doing something(finding Al Quida) that the real terrorist (Bush) couldn’t do. Get real; and now I guess now we are being forced to wear lapel pins or cover our hearts for a song? You say you would die for your country, well why are you sitting in Bastrop and not Iraq? 3. Chris your comment about Obama is not even worthy of a reply. 4. LD: I can feel what you are saying.

By r.mary

March 3, 2008 12:40 AM | Link to this

The Rezko trial starts today 3/3/08. Check the Chicago Tribune and Suntimes for news. Wonder if Obama is finally going to answer questions to his local papers about his ties to this man?

By Stephen

March 3, 2008 5:32 PM | Link to this

Sylvia, you need to go back and read exactly what I said. I never mentioned bin Laden. If you really did any reading, you would find what I was referencing to regarding his Chicago associates who previously bombed the police offices in NYC and the Pentagon. Check the Chicago paper, NYT etc. No, I don’t have papers on my head. Perhaps if you read something other than moveon.org items, you would know.

I quit wearing hats after my second tour in Vietnam. That was after leaving the hospital at Brooke Army Medical Center in San Antonio.

If I weren’t now 60, I would be with those soldiers in Iraq.

I won’t bother asking you if you would ever fight for your country. I know the answer “it depends”, “not for Bush”, “not for oil”.

If that is what you would say, my answer would be grow up. The soldiers wouldn’t want you around anyway to risk getting themselves killed.

So sorry you can’t deal with the facts. Those men and women are fighting for you whether you want to accept that or not. At least carry on a rational conversation.

 

Now that the slipper fits, read how to plan a fairy-tale wedding with your Prince Charming. Waco wedding coordinator Donna Roach of Wolfe Wholesale Florist offers tips and tricks for making the Big Day memorable.


Message boards


Community blogs


—Voices from around Waco

 

Wacotrib News | Wacotrib Weather | Sports | Living | Business News | Wacotrib Schools | Opinions | Baylor Football
Wacotrib Cars | Wacotrib Real Estate | Wacotrib Jobs | Classifieds | Sitemap

Copyright 2008 Waco Tribune-Herald. All rights reserved. - The Waco Tribune-Herald - Our Partners

By using this service, you accept the terms of our visitor agreement and privacy policy.
Registered site users, you may edit your profile.
Having trouble? Visit our help & FAQ.