Home > story comments > Archives > 2009 > June > 27 > Entry
EDITORIAL: Successes of Jackson, Fawcett say plenty about us
Permalink | Comments (4) | Post your comment | Categories: Opinion page
Commenting is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F
Post a comment
Before you comment, please take a few moments to make sure that what you're saying is civil and respectful. We don't tolerate personal attacks, insults, name-calling, impersonations or generally hateful comments — they don't make for a pleasant (or productive) conversation. We want to raise the level of debate and encourage a wide diversity of viewpoints — and that means disagreeing without being disagreeable. If you wouldn't say it to your grandmother, you probably shouldn't say it here.
Your comment will be removed from WacoTrib.com if it runs afoul of these guidelines or anything else in our site's visitor agreement.
*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.
Comments
By KDF
June 27, 2009 10:46 AM | Link to this | Report comment abuse
My sympathies go out to the families of Ms. Fawcett and Mr. Jackson. But these stories are taking center attention away from some problems we still have in America. American “Idol” gets millions of votes each week for around a buck a piece. What if we were giving a buck each to feed people, help the homeless, etc.. That might mean $10 million dollars a week!! God says in Matthew 25:35-36 that “I was hungry and you gave me something to eat…” Isn’t this what America is about??? Not Cap and Trade which simply makes us more reliable on government. <><
By mec
June 27, 2009 11:29 AM | Link to this | Report comment abuse
A short and dignified noting of their passing should be sufficient.
By Bill Whitaker
June 27, 2009 3:29 PM | Link to this | Report comment abuse
Bill Whitaker responds: We don’t usually mark the passing of actors and singers on our editorial pages, but these two, I felt, were significant icons. If newspapers and news programs felt confident making them Page One news for a day, the least we could do was try to gauge their significance (if concisely) in our world. John and I did disagree on who was most significant, however. John favored the King of Pop, I felt Farrah might resonate more with Texans. (Maybe it’s because I once interviewed her.) In any case, I finally agreed he was right and gave MJ the lead spot. But my heart remains with Farrah.
By Waco. We do-do.
June 27, 2009 10:10 PM | Link to this | Report comment abuse
Jackson was without doubt talented, driven and energetic. Fawcett primary was a product of the lucky DNA club and Madison Ave. I don’t begrudge either of them success, they were both worthy of the success they achieved… just as worthy as the hardworking kindergarten teacher, doctor, nurse, or electrician, or classical music performer from Julliard, Eastman or Curtis. For me, Jackson died a long time ago, say, 1993, when the tune changed. In the ‘80’s, my cassette player got worn out playing the Off The Wall album, and my band performed two of his tunes.
Their out of proportion financial success is more a reflection on the questionable tastes of Americans who, not surprisingly go for pointy nipples and crotch-grabbing pelvic thrusts than teaching a youngster, saving a life, or shaping a beautiful melodic phrase.
Brian Williams on NBC said they were going to devote the evening news to Farrah, but switched to Jackson on short notice. Ironic ending for a celebrity who spent her life chasing TV’s bright lights. Moral- when you die, make sure you are the most important person to die that day.
I’m sorry MJ didn’t get to do his tour to Europe, and re-focus the attention on his music, and not his prurient appetite. It would have been nice for him to go out on a high note. People, in general, have a right to be judged by their best moments.
RIP