Home > Bible Talk > Archives > 2008 > April > 22
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
Could the bible be confirmed in Court if put on trial?
Fellow blogger Jeff asks us all the following questions: “If the Bible was put on trial, by the same argument standards as any other litigation, would it be confirmed or denied by an unbiased judge? I would suggest before everyone ways in, that you look at how many centuries have been put into studying this, from the inspection at the tomb, to the discovery of Noah’s Ark. Is there enough supporting evidence even to say it’s historically accurate, for which it should be argued that at least it should be taught in schools as history. Also, how do you discredit the millions of drastically changed lives by adhering to its principles?”
If I were the attorney, I would call all the “witnesses” of the bible to share their testimony. I would then show the discovery channel’s story that verifies that Jesus tomb was indeed found and verified by DNA evidence. I would also have the ARP {Ark Research Project} tell the court that Noah’s Ark has been located and exists in the ice fields on Ararat. I personally believe that the bible has been the most scrutinized and studied book on the planet. It has been studied to prove its accuracies and has been studied to disprove its facts. With all this research, surely it should be taught in schools from a historical perspective.
Obviously, you know by now that I am playing along with this idea of trying to confirm all the stories of the bible. I will share with you my true feelings as the dialogue goes forth. So tell me fellow bloggers-could the bible be confirmed in Court if put on trial?
